New 5.0 vs LS1 Camaro

[Aetos]

Things to keep in mind, Mustang had a passenger and the driver looks heavier, as well as leaving TCS on.

The Camaro is close to stock, not exactly sure on his mods, but definitely not anything crazy like full exhaust(probably an intake lid)

For the circumstances... I think the 5.0 did awesome. Can't wait to see actual real comparisons done!

 

[OhTreShinyGrey]

2010 5.0?

 

[Aetos]

2010 5.0?

Guy that edited the video obviously suffers from a severe mental disorder

 

[OhTreShinyGrey]

I was going to say, where the fuck have I been, lmao.

 

[booby]

think the issue here is more driver than passenger

great find though bro!

 

[TBapp3]

Sweet video...What is a LS1 Camaro putting out for power??

 

[Aetos]

Sweet video...What is a LS1 Camaro putting out for power??

I wish I knew... to guesstimate if it just has minor bolt ons(no long tubes or anything else, which I doubt or it should have been quicker than that)... I'm guessing anywhere from 300-320 to the wheels..

In the case of that race, i think the LS1 had a good 400-500lbs less than the 5.0, not to mention the driver of the 5.0 was shit and left tcs on.

 

[1990_LX]

I really don't like the 2010+, but god, even compared to the Mustang that Camaro is ugly as balls.

 

[matt07gt]

I liked the bird poop all over the Camaro

 

[Quick281]

camaro shouldnt have won that race..... either sprayed or modded pretty good

 

[TBapp3]

^I was thinking something along the lines myself...But then again I dont know too much about camaro's! lol

 

[Quick281]

5.0 puts 380+ on the ground. shouldnt have a problem beating that camaro.

 

[Aetos]

5.0 puts 380+ on the ground. shouldnt have a problem beating that camaro.

they don't put 380+ to the ground... or that must be the most efficient drivetrain on the planet. The engine puts out 412hp, in order for the car to have 380 to the ground means there's only a 8% loss... are you serious now?

Here is evolution Performance dyno on a stock 2011. The dyno of 2011 that hit 380+ were dynoing in 4th gear, which is NOT the 2011 1:1 gear, where dynos are supposed to be done.

Lets say the camaro was pushing 310-320 to the wheels. The mustang has a good 400-500lbs on the camaro(this is counting the driver/passengers), as well as having TCS and being a new car the driver isn't acquainted with. If the camaro sprayed or had serious mods... they wouldn't have been that close to each other at all...

 

[Quick281]

they don't put 380+ to the ground... or that must be the most efficient drivetrain on the planet. The engine puts out 412hp, in order for the car to have 380 to the ground means there's only a 8% loss... are you serious now?

Here is evolution Performance dyno on a stock 2011. The dyno of 2011 that hit 380+ were dynoing in 4th gear, which is NOT the 2011 1:1 gear, where dynos are supposed to be done.

Lets say the camaro was pushing 310-320 to the wheels. The mustang has a good 400-500lbs on the camaro(this is counting the driver/passengers), as well as having TCS and being a new car the driver isn't acquainted with.

there was an article out on the 5.0 ---- 395ish RWHP.

 

[Aetos]

there was an article out on the 5.0 ---- 395ish RWHP.

and that article was dynoed in 4th, which is NOT the 1:1 gear of the new mustang.

My car pushing 600rwhp on the dyno too... in 1st...


Just think of what low drivetrain loss is needed for the mustangs to be dnyoing at 395.. and.. if they were pushing 395.. I damn well hope they would hit a lot better than high 12s...

 

[TBapp3]

I thought some one had a thread of theme hitting 11s....Plus.....Dont they say Ford underestimated the terminators??? I thought thats what Iv heard...Couldn't it be a similar possibility....Not that its such a small drivtrain loss??? Just a mess up on the estimated horsepower originally:idk:

 

[dsblk93gt]

they don't put 380+ to the ground... or that must be the most efficient drivetrain on the planet. The engine puts out 412hp, in order for the car to have 380 to the ground means there's only a 8% loss... are you serious now?

Here is evolution Performance dyno on a stock 2011. The dyno of 2011 that hit 380+ were dynoing in 4th gear, which is NOT the 2011 1:1 gear, where dynos are supposed to be done.

Lets say the camaro was pushing 310-320 to the wheels. The mustang has a good 400-500lbs on the camaro(this is counting the driver/passengers), as well as having TCS and being a new car the driver isn't acquainted with. If the camaro sprayed or had serious mods... they wouldn't have been that close to each other at all...

Thats on a Mustang Dyno which reads lower than a dynojet.

Everyone else is getting 375-395 stock rwhp on dynojet stock, yes there are under-rated.

 

[dsblk93gt]

and that article was dynoed in 4th, which is NOT the 1:1 gear of the new mustang.

My car pushing 600rwhp on the dyno too... in 1st...


Just think of what low drivetrain loss is needed for the mustangs to be dnyoing at 395.. and.. if they were pushing 395.. I damn well hope they would hit a lot better than high 12s...

You are not very familiar with dyno's. The #'s are HIGHER when in 1:1 not lower. It's the same as if you have 3.31 gears in a GT500 and go to 3.73 gears, no other changes it will dyno LESS hp.

 

[Aetos]

Then, that driver really sucks or they're lying about the camaro mods

 

[MineralGray02K]

Nice video - thanks for sharing