2010 plans

[Quick281]

Thats exactly what i had in mind!!! Bassani off road x-pipe.....just dont no if i would need the high flow cats for inspections!?!?!?!?!

yup you def need some kind of cat

 

[TBapp3]

So whats the dif. with these except for the filter being relocated???? witch would be more recommended????

http://www.americanmuscle.com/jlt-96-04-gt-rai.html

http://www.americanmuscle.com/jlt-96-04-gt-cai.html

 

[Mustang Willis]

i'm pretty sure it's just the location of the filter. on my other forum i was told that the fenderwell is a better place for it because there's less of a chance of moisture to get in there

 

[TBapp3]

ahh...... any other input????

 

[TBapp3]

http://www.americanmuscle.com/understanding-mustang-air-intakes.html

Just read this and it kinda makes me feel as if the ram air would be better????

 

[TBapp3]

anyone????

 

[Quick281]

im not a big fan of sticking the filter in the fender well. i had a jlt cai on my 04, worked just fine

 

[TBapp3]

Would this kinda stuff with the tuner actually make some RWHP or what???

 

[cobra20sc]

if you're looking for quarter mile performance (or 0-60) gears will be the best bang for the buck. won't do much in terms of RWHP but will make the car accelerate like it had 25% more torque if you're going from 3.27's to 4.10's.
underdrive pulleys on the 5.0L also used to be pretty effective in gaining some torque across the board (~10ft-lbs). i'm assuming the gains would be similar on the 4.6L.

-chris

 

[Quick281]

jlt + tune on a 2v is prob good for 20 rwhp.

 

[TBapp3]

Hey thanks again guys!

 

[TBapp3]

jlt + tune on a 2v is prob good for 20 rwhp.

Now that is something I like to hear!I no I need to build up some power some how!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[FrostByte]

you'll get a better sound with an h

Thats a matter of opinion Tony.

 

[TBapp3]

^yea...honestly I think I'm going for the Bassani catted X pipe anyhow.

 

[TBapp3]

I do have a 8.8in rear end right????

 

[Stangerang]

I do have a 8.8in rear end right????

Yes, your mustang has an 8.8in. rear.

 

[TBapp3]

thanks!

 

[TBapp3]

if you're looking for quarter mile performance (or 0-60) gears will be the best bang for the buck. won't do much in terms of RWHP but will make the car accelerate like it had 25% more torque if you're going from 3.27's to 4.10's.
underdrive pulleys on the 5.0L also used to be pretty effective in gaining some torque across the board (~10ft-lbs). i'm assuming the gains would be similar on the 4.6L.

-chris

thanks chris.....If I cant get blown this season I think I will do those pulleys as well....

thanks everyone -TBapp-

 

[TBapp3]

So do you guys think there is any way of making 300RWHP with the 2v staying NA or is that a long shot????

 

[Quick281]

So do you guys think there is any way of making 300RWHP with the 2v staying NA or is that a long shot????

im sure its possible, intake, cams, exhaust, pullies.